Previous Page  75 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 75 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

73

took the average retention time of gunshot in the gizzards

of mallard from experimental studies to be 20 days. He then

divided the length of the hunting season by this 20 day period

to give a turnover correction factor to account for the numbers

of birds ingesting gunshot throughout the season. In the UK

the wildfowl hunting season is at least 153 days (1 Sept until

end of January inland – longer below the high water mark

in all but Northern Ireland). We therefore used a correction

factor of 7.5 (150/20) to account for turnover. By analysing

ring recoveries, Bellrose calculated the absolute difference in

the annual mortality rate of wild mallards in the USA between

ringed ducks dosed experimentally with various numbers

of gunshot and control ducks that were ringed but not

given gunshot. This difference was for the year immediately

following ringing and dosing (detailed in Bellrose 1959, Table

27 and pages 274-276). We assumed that these additional

annual mortality rates would be broadly similar for all wildfowl.

From these calculations, presented in Table 5, we estimate that

73,750 birds of the 16 species presented in Table 3 might die

every winter in Britain from lead poisoning following gunshot

ingestion (this figure would be slightly higher for the UK at c.

75,000, using data from Musgrove

et al.

2013).

This may underestimate mortality for several reasons. It does

not include species of wildfowl for which UK data on the

incidence of gunshot ingestion is not available (

e.g.

some of

the goose species), and does not include mortality caused

by gunshot ingested in the UK outside of the hunting season

(which will occur but likely with a reduced incidence). It also

excludes the sub-lethal effects of lead which can also influence

mortality. These three factors would result in our estimate of

mortality being too low. A few factors could potentially result

in our estimate being too high. We assume that mortality

levels given ingestion of a specific number of gunshot will

be similar in all species to those used by Bellrose (1959) for

mallard, while these may be higher in some species and lower

in others. It is possible that mortality levels could be lower

in the geese and swans ingesting small numbers of gunshot

Table 5: Estimate of numbers of 16 species of wildfowl listed in Table 3 dying of lead gunshot ingestion annually during winter.

Number of

gunshot

ingested

% hunter-

shot birds

with

ingested

gunshot

1

Hunting bias

correction

2

%with

ingested

gunshot

after

correction

for hunting

bias

%with

ingested

gunshot

corrected for

turnover

3

Additional

mortality

rate (annual

probability

of death)

4

% of the

population

estimated as

dying of lead

poisoning

5

Number

of birds

estimated as

dying

6

1

1.89

1.5

1.26

9.45

0.09

0.85

20,039

2

0.525

1.9

0.276

2.07

0.23

0.48

11,230

3

0.081

2

0.041

0.30

0.3

0.09

2,147

4

0.207

2.1

0.098

0.74

0.36

0.27

6,255

5

0.207

2.2

0.094

0.70

0.43

0.30

7,132

6 or more

0.578

2.35

0.246

1.84

0.62

1.14

26,947

Totals

3.487

2.015

15.11

3.13

73,750

1

Assuming incidences from Mudge (1983) for 12 of the 16 species in Table 3;

2

Correction factor based upon the increased likelihood of hunters to shoot wildfowl that

have ingested lead gunshot (Bellrose 1959);

3

Assuming a 150 day hunting season (Britain) and an average 20 day residence time of gunshot in the gizzard – turnover

of 150/20 = 7.5 (see Bellrose 1959);

4

Mortality level is the increase in mortality in mallard caused by ingestion of set numbers of lead gunshot (see Bellrose 1959) – we

assume that the mortality level would be similar in all species;

5

% with ingested gunshot corrected for hunting bias and turnover multiplied by mortality level;

6

Using

wintering wildfowl estimates from Musgrove

et al.

(2011).

Lead poisoning of wildlife in the UK