97
Availability and use of non-toxic ammunition: practicalities and regulations
STEVENSON AL, SCHEUHAMMER AM, CHAN HM (2005).
Effects of nontoxic
shot regulations on lead accumulation in ducks and American woodcock in
Canada.
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
48(3), 405-
413. DOI:10.1007/s00244-004-0044-x.
STROUD DA (2015).
Regulation of some sources of lead poisoning: a
brief review. In: Delahay RJ, Spray CJ (eds).
Proceedings of the Oxford Lead
Symposium
.
Lead ammunition: understanding and minimising the risks to
human and environmental health.
Edward Grey Institute, The University of
Oxford. pp 8-26. Available at:
http://oxfordleadsymposium.info. Accessed:
October 2015.
THOMAS V (2009).
Nontoxic shot ammunition; types, availability, and use for
upland game hunting.
The Wildlife Professional
3(2), 50-51.
THOMAS VG, OWEN M (1996).
Preventing lead toxicosis of European
waterfowl by regulatory and non-regulatory means.
Environmental
Conservation
23(4), 358-364.
THOMASVG, GUITART R (2003).
Lead pollution from shooting and angling, and
a common regulative approach.
Environmental Policy and Law
33(3), 143-149.
THOMAS VG, SCHEUHAMMER AM, BOND DE (2009).
Bone lead levels
and lead isotope ratios in red grouse from Scottish and Yorkshire moors.
Science of the Total Environment
407(11), 3494-3502. DOI: 10.1016/j.
scitotenv.2009.02.003.
THOMAS VG (2010).
Achieving uniform regulation of environmental lead
exposure and poisoning in wildlife and humans.
The Environmentalist
30(2),
206-210.
THOMAS VG, GUITART R (2010).
Limitations of European Union policy
and law for regulating use of lead shot and sinkers: comparisons with North
American regulation.
Environmental Policy and Governance
20(1), 57-72. DOI:
10.1002/eet.527.
Shotgun cartridges: a range of non-toxic alternatives are available. Steel shot represents the most widely used non-toxic
alternative to lead and is comparably priced.
Photo Credit: A. Johnson
THOMASVG (2013).
Lead-free hunting rifle ammunition: product availability,
price, effectiveness, and role in global wildlife conservation.
AMBIO
42(6), 737-
745. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-012-0361-7.
THOMASVG,GUITARTR(2013).
Transitiontonon-toxicgunshotuse inOlympic
shooting: policy implications for IOC and UNEP in resolving an environmental
problem.
AMBIO
42(6), 746-754. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-013-0393-7.
TRINOGGA A, FRITSCH G, HOFER H, KRONE O (2013).
Are lead-free hunting
rifle bullets as effective at killing wildlife as conventional lead bullets? A
comparison based on wound size and morphology.
Science of the Total
Environment
443, 226-232. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.084.
UNEP-CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES (2014a).
Resolution 11.15.
Preventing poisoning of migratory birds. Adopted by the Conference of the
Parties at its 11th meeting, 4-9 November 2014, Quito, Ecuador Available at:
http://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/document/Res_11_15_Preventing_Bird_Poisoning_of_Birds_E_0.pdf
. Accessed: August 2015.
UNEP-CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES (2014b).
Review and
Guidelines to Prevent the Risk of Poisoning of Migratory Birds.
UNEP/
CMS/COP11/Doc.23.1.2.
Bonn, Germany. Available at:
http://www.cms.
int/sites/default/files/document/COP11_Doc_23_1_2_Bird_Poisoning_
Review_%26_Guidelines_E_0.pdf
. Accessed: August 2015.
USFWS (1997).
Migratory bird hunting: revised test protocol for nontoxic
approval procedures for shot and shot coatings. 50CFR Part 20. Department
of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Federal register
62(230): 63608-63615.
WATSON RT, FULLER M, POKRAS M, HUNT W (eds) (2009).
Proceedings of
the conference ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: implications for wildlife
and humans.
The Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID, USA.