Previous Page  103 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 103 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

101

very sophisticated high performance products. Recently, Pierce

et al.

(2014) reviewed historical studies and showed comparable

lethality performance by lead and non-lead shot based on field

test hunting of mourning doves

Zenaida macroura

. In summary,

development has shown that steel and other non-lead metals

can be manufactured into pellets and loaded into high quality

cartridges in a way that ensures a well performing and lethal

shot. Several studies show that the practical efficiency and

lethality of a shot is connected primarily to the ability of the

shooter to hit his/her target. The change from lead to non-

lead shot in Denmark has put a positive focus on the need to

educate and train hunters. Noer

et al.

(2001) showed that during

the period when lead shot was phased out the frequency of

wounding of different game species (

e.g.

pink-footed goose

Anser brachyrhynchus

and red fox

Vulpes vulpes

) in Denmark

declined. Danish hunters have become acquainted with non-

lead shot. A generation of new hunters has never fired a lead

shot cartridge.

SOCIAL BARRIERS

Many Danish hunters were worried that the phasing out of

lead shot would cause a decline in numbers of hunters and

weaken the socio-political power of the hunting community in

Denmark. The same concern is raised today in other countries

as an argument against the phase-out of lead shot. The validity

of this argument can be tested by using the Danish example

of a 20 year total ban on lead shot. The hypothesis is that if

hunters began giving up hunting due to the phase-out of lead

shot this would cause a decline in the harvest of game and/or

numbers of hunters. In the following section two parameters are

analysed: firstly, the number of hunters in Denmark over time,

and secondly, the hunting bag of three groups of quarry species

harvested with shotguns over time. Data for both are available

from the 1970s and 1980s respectively and data for the period of

the phase-out of lead shot can easily be extracted.

Since the 1930s Danish hunters have been registered as it is

a legal requirement that they possess a hunting license. The

system is administered by the Government, and since 1989 by

the Ministry of Environment. Data are published and are openly

available. Figure 1 shows the number of hunting license holders

in Denmark in the period from 1980 to 2013.

In general, the number of hunters remains stable over the whole

period. It has fluctuated between 160,000 and 175,000, and thus

has changed by less than 10% over the period of 33 years. There

seems to be a slight decline from the year 2000 and thereafter,

but this is unlikely to be a reaction to the regulation of lead

shot that came into force earlier. Neither is it likely that the new

hunting act of 1993 had a significant impact. The most likely

reason for the small fluctuations is that the number of hunters is

affected by the popularity of hunting and therefore on societal

trends more than legal regulations. Today, 30 years after the first

regulation of lead shot and almost 20 year after the total ban,

the number of hunters in Denmark is the highest (177,000) since

registration was introduced in the 1930s. There seems to be no

indication, that the regulation and total phase-out of lead shot

for hunting has had any negative impact either on the number

of hunters or on the long term popularity of hunting.

The annual harvest is monitored by the Danish Centre for

Environment and Energy/Aarhus University and basic data are

publicly available.

Figure 1:

Number of hunting license holders in Denmark from 1980 to 2013.

Arrows indicate the time of regulation of lead shot in three hunting

habitats. Source: Annual publications from the Danish Nature Agency protocols.

Practical and social barriers to switching to non-toxic ammuntion: Danish experience