Previous Page  41 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

39

A limitation of this study is that Green and Pain (2012)

estimated BMDs but did not estimate BMDLs, as was done by

EFSA (2010). This is because of the difficulties associated with

including uncertainties in the additional elements used in their

calculations, such as bioavailability. Had BMDLs been calculated

they would have indicated that consumption of smaller

quantities of gamebird-derived meals would result in BMDL

doses than those resulting in the BMD doses.

We used the results of analyses of national diet data from the

NDNS (as described earlier) and UK population data for 2013 to

estimate maximum numbers of individuals in the UK exceeding

the threshold intake rates of gamebird meat required to be at

potential risk from incurring critical responses (see Table 2). We

used the number of children less than 8.0 years old as the group

at potential risk from incurring IQ and SATs effects. We used the

number of women in the age range 18.0 to 45.0 years old as the

group at potential risk from incurring the spontaneous abortion

effect and did not attempt to allow for the proportion that were

pregnant. The estimates are maxima because we assumed that

the proportion of people consuming gamebird meals and the

distribution of amounts consumed per four-day period were

constant throughout the year and as specified by analyses of

the data shown in Figures 1 and 2. Although there may be some

consistency over time in game consumption, its magnitude is

unknown. If consumers did not eat game consistently through

the year at the rates indicatedby theNDNS survey, thenumber of

consumers would be larger than our estimates but the average

amount eaten per consumer would be smaller. The net result

would be a reduction in the numbers of people with gamebird

meal intakes exceeding those required to be at potential risk of

the critical responses.

The maximumnumbers shown inTable 2 indicate the potential

for tens of thousands of UK children to have gamebird meal

intakes exceeding those required to be at potential risk

from incurring the critical responses for IQ and SATs scores.

Maximum numbers of adults exceeding threshold intake rates

for potential risk of incurring cardiovascular, nephrotoxicity

and spontaneous abortion critical responses tended to be

smaller, being hundreds or thousands. The exception was

for the chronic kidney disease critical response as defined by

the dose-response model used by ESFA (2010). This model

indicated that over one hundred thousand people might

exceed the threshold intake rate. However, as noted by Green

and Pain (2012), this dose-response model did not allow for

potential confounding variables and may overestimate effects.

The alternative model proposed by Green and Pain (2012)

allows for confounding variables and gives smaller maximum

numbers (Table 2).

Recognising that the results shown in Table 2 are maxima,

we also calculated equivalent minimum values using

independent data. We used the results of an unpublished

survey of the shooting community in the UK conducted by

the British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC)

and the Countryside Alliance (CA), which is cited in LAG (2014).

The survey estimated that about 9,000 (midpoint of range

5,500-12,500) children under 8 years old and about 44,500

adults (midpoint of range 27,000 - 62,000) from the shooting

community consume at least one game meal per week

averaged over the year. This estimate refers to all types of game,

but, as most game in the UK is shot using lead ammunition, it

is likely that the vast majority of the game meals reported by

members of the shooting community were made using wild

gamebirds killed using lead ammunition.

We used the estimates of the threshold intake rates of

gamebird meat required to be at potential risk of incurring the

critical responses from Table 2 in combination with the LAG

(2014) estimates of numbers of high-level consumers analyses

of game in the UK and the results of the FSAS (2012) survey of

the distribution of numbers of game meals eaten per week by

high-level game consumers in Scotland to estimate minimum

numbers of individuals in the UK potentially exceeding the

thresholds (Table 3). We used the number of children less than

8.0 years old as the group at potential risk from incurring IQ and

SATs effects because this is the age group used in the survey

results cited in LAG (2014). We assumed that the proportion of

adult high-level consumers who were women in the age range

18.0 to 45.0 years old was the same as for all UK adults in 2013.

Because the rates of consumption of game in the FSAS (2012)

and LAG (2014) surveys were in meals per week rather than

weights of meat, it was necessary to assume an average meal

size. We used the values used by Green and Pain (2012), based

upon the 200 g game meal size for adults used by EFSA (2010)

and also the lower values (30 g for children, 100 g for adults)

for gamebird meals from FSA (2002). We used bootstrap

resampling of the FSAS (2012) survey data, as described

previously, to estimate uncertainty in the numbers. From each

bootstrap replicate, a non-parametric cumulative distribution

of numbers of game meals per year was constructed and

proportions of subjects exceeding a specified threshold were

obtained by linear interpolation.

UK human health risks from ammunition-derived lead