Previous Page  61 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 61 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

59

Current legislative controls and monitoring of industrial,

municipal and agricultural lead emissions in the UK are such

that cases of clinical lead poisoning from these sources in

wildlife are likely to be rare. High concentrations of lead derived

from sources other than ammunition and fishing weights exist

in some soils in urban areas and near centres of current and

historical industrial activity, especially mining and smelting.

Some lead derived from anglers’ lead weights used before

restrictions on their sale and use were introduced in 1987 is

present in some wetlands and rivers, but additional lead from

this source has probably been added at a low rate since then

through a small amount of permitted use, and any illegal use

that may have occurred. The mute swan

Cygnus olor

is the

species reported to have been significantly affected by the

ingestion of anglers’ lead weights in the UK (Birkhead 1982,

Birkhead and Perrins 1986) probably because of their habit of

frequenting urban rivers and lakes where fishing activity is high.

The recorded decrease in the incidence of lead poisoning in

mute swans (Sears and Hunt 1990) and corresponding increase

in their populations following the 1987 restrictions (Kirby

et al.

1994) suggests that restrictions were largely successful. Newth

et al.

(2012) similarly found that the proportion of deaths

attributable to lead poisoning in a sample of mute swans

decreased significantly over time after restrictions,

i.e.

from 25%

between 1971 and 1987 (pre-restrictions) to 4.6%between 1988

and 1999 and 2% between 2000 and 2010.

Beyond these sources, lead derived from ammunition now

appears to be the only significant, geographically widespread

and common source of unregulated environmental lead

contamination to which wildlife is exposed.

This paper aims to bring together a broad range of evidence

to illustrate the pathways by which wildlife is exposed to

ammunition-derived lead and review the extent and impact of

the problem in the UK.

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF LEAD

Lead is a non-essential metal that has no biological benefit to

living organisms and is toxic to all vertebrates. Lead is also toxic

to invertebrates but sensitivities appear to vary considerably

(Eisler 1988). It is an accumulative metabolic poison that is non-

specific, affecting a wide range of physiological and biochemical

systems. These include the haematopoietic, vascular, nervous,

renal and reproductive systems (Eisler 1988, USATSDR 2007,

EFSA 2010, Franson and Pain 2011). Lead occurs primarily in

inorganic form in the environment and lead in ammunition is in

its elemental metallic form. In this paper, the term“lead”refers to

inorganic lead. Following absorption, the effects of lead upon an

animal’s body systems are independent of source.

The toxic effects of lead are broadly similar in all vertebrates.

In wild animals these effects are well known from numerous

experimental and field studies. These have been reviewed many

times (

e.g.

Eisler 1988, Pattee and Pain 2003, Franson and Pain

2011, Ma 2011). Although the present paper deals withwildlife in

general, we have focussed upon birds because they are by far the

most significantly studied taxon and are significantly affected.

Clinical signs of poisoning are often associated with chronic

exposure to lead in birds. Chronic exposure is extended exposure

at a level that is not necessarily likely to cause immediate failure of

biological functioning or death, although death may eventually

result. Signs include anaemia, lethargy, muscle wasting and loss

of fat reserves, green diarrhoea staining the vent, wing droop,

lack of balance and coordination and other neurological signs

such as leg paralysis or convulsions (

e.g.

Locke and Thomas 1996,

Wobeser 1997, Friend and Franson 1999, Eisler 2000, Pattee

and Pain 2003). In cases where birds die rapidly following acute

exposure to high levels of lead, many of these signs may be

absent.

Numerous experiments have been conducted where captive

birds frommany taxa, including wildfowl and raptors, have been

dosed with lead gunshot and blood lead concentrations and

physiological responses reported relative to controls (

e.g.

Pattee

et al.

2006, Hoffman

et al.

1981, 1985, reviews in Eisler 1988,

see also Pattee and Pain 2003, and Franson and Pain 2011). In

some instances, lead ammunition or ammunition fragments are

eliminated rapidly from a bird’s alimentary canal with little lead

absorption, but they are also often retained until completely

eroded,withtheleadbecomingsolublesaltsandmuchofitbeing

absorbed by the bird. The acidic conditions in birds’ stomachs

and the strong mechanically grinding action in the gizzards of

certain bird species facilitate erosion and solubilisation of lead

ammunition, and blood lead concentrations can rapidly become

elevated after ingestion of gunshot (

e.g.

see Hoffman

et al.

1981,

1985, Pain and Rattner 1988, Pattee

et al.

2006). Absorbed lead is

transported in the bloodstream and deposited rapidly into soft

tissues, primarily the liver and kidney, intobone, and thegrowing

feathers of birds. Lead in bone is retained for long periods and

bone lead concentrations increase over an animal’s lifetime,

whereas lead in soft tissues has a much shorter half-life (often

Lead poisoning of wildlife in the UK