Previous Page  127 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 127 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

125

ABSTRACT

Questions and concerns about the use of lead-free ammunition in hunting were encountered during the Oxford Lead

Symposium. Many originated from commonly-held, but unsubstantiated, reports that have hindered the transition

to use of lead-free ammunition in the UK and elsewhere. This paper examines and answers the principal reservations

raised about the use of lead-free hunting ammunition. The issue of how the evidence for lead exposure and toxicity

to wildlife from discharged lead shot cartridges could be better communicated to the public to enhance adoption of

lead–free ammunition is addressed. The paper presents evidence to assuage concerns about the effectiveness and non-

toxicity of lead ammunition substitutes, their suitability for British shooting andweapons, and their role in wildlife health

protection. Collectively, these answers to concerns could lower the public resistance to use of lead-free ammunition and

thus make game shooting a more environmentally-sustainable pursuit.

Key words:

Lead-free ammunition, misconceptions, use, shooting, ballistics, toxicity, barrel damage, efficacy, shot pattern,

ricochet, availability

INTRODUCTION

Despite a large volume of scientific evidence that spent lead

shotgun and rifle ammunition poses risks to wildlife and

human health (Watson

et al.

2009, Group of Scientists, 2013,

2014), there has been, with a few notable exceptions, marked

reluctance across the international shooting community to

adopt lead-free substitutes. Exceptions include Denmark and

The Netherlands, which banned all use of lead gunshot – as

long ago as 1996 in Denmark (Kanstrup 2015). Other nations,

including the UK, have begun to prohibit lead use where the

evidence of lead poisoning of wildlife has been, historically,

most apparent. In England in 1999 this resulted in a ban on lead

shot use for hunting waterfowl or over certain, listed, wetlands,

with regulations following in the other UK countries. However,

compliance with the English regulations still appears to be

very low 15 years on (Cromie

et al.

2015). No nation has yet to

regulate the use of both lead-free shotgun and rifle ammunition

for hunting, although the state of California will do so in 2019

(Thomas 2015). At the recent Conference of the Parties to the

Convention on Migratory Species (COP 11, Quito, November

2014), a resolution was passed, the guidance to which calls for

the replacement of all lead ammunition, in all habitats, with

Key questions and responses regarding the

transition to use of lead-free ammunition

Vernon G. Thomas

1†

, Niels Kanstrup

2

& Carl Gremse

3,

4

1

Department of Integrative Biology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada

2

Danish Academy of Hunting, DK-8410, Ronde, Denmark

3

Faculty of Wildlife Biology, Management and Hunting Practice, University of Applied Sciences Eberswalde,

Alfred – Moeller – Str. 1, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany

4

Leibniz – Institute for Zoo andWildlife Research, P.O. Box 601103, D-10252 Berlin, Germany

Corresponding author email address:

[email protected]

A paper written with reference to the Oxford Lead Symposium rapporteur’s records.