123
Sociological and political barriers to transition to non-toxic ammuntion: UK experience
Shot were judged to be ‘non-recent’when they:
1. had been ‘walled off’ by the body showing they have been
present for some time;
2. showed no sign of bruising or haemorrhage around them;
3. were found in non-vital areas such as loose in the coelomic
cavity (accepting that they may or may not have been
‘recent’but were likely to be non-lethal).
SHOT ANALYSIS
Shot type was identified using the methodology employed
during the Defra-funded compliance study
24
. In brief, these
were based on their physical, chemical and additionally
atomic properties
i.e.
aspects of appearance and malleability,
ferromagnetic properties, reaction to nitric acid and potassium
iodide, and, for a sub-set of shot (32/109), including those for
which there were some inconsistencies in other methods
25
,
examination under scanning electron microscope which
produces definitive characteristic X-ray “profile” of the elements
present
26
. These techniques readily identify steel, bismuth
and lead, and distinguish them from each other. From a brief
review of types of shot available on the market, lead, bismuth,
steel and tungsten matrix shot types were used as positive
controls throughout the analyses. Provisional diagnosis of shot
type was made using results of appearance, malleability and
ferromagnetism. Results of chemical analyses and scanning
electron microscopy were considered conclusive.
Figure S2:
The‘X-ray output’from scanning electronmicroscopy
showing both a shot originally classified as ‘leadwith inconsistencies’
(a)
and a bismuth
sample
(b)
. The peaks indicate the shot to contain oxygen (O), carbon (C) and lead (Pb) (a) or bismuth (Bi) (b), peak height illustrating relative abundance.
(a)
(b)
FURTHER RESULTS OF THE 2013/14 GAME
DEALER STUDY
Of 159 ducks purchased from 32 game dealer outlets, 109
contained recent shot. Overall, 77% of these 109 ducks had been
shot with lead. Bismuth was the most commonly used non-
toxic shot (15%) followed by steel (7%). Figure S2 illustrates the
outputs of a lead and bismuth sample from scanning electron
microscopy.
Table S1 summaries the numbers of birds purchased regionally,
the number containing recent shot and the proportion of these
that had been shot with different shot types.
24
Melting point was omitted as it was extremely onerous and time consuming, difficult to measure and provided no additional confidence to the results.
25
Five of the lead samples (including one copper coated lead shot) had slight inconsistencies
e.g.
not looking obviously like lead in all characteristic or the precipitate
changing colour during the chemical analysis. Two samples, which were ultimately non-lead, had been described as“unsure”prior to scanning electron microscopy
analysis.
26
A high energy beam of electrons scans the sample surface and interacts with the sample atoms to produce characteristic x-rays which identify the
elemental composition, the areas under each peak provides a measure of relative abundance of elements in the sample.